Miniatures Transport and Storage Options, Part Two — Chessex
It’s been a while since my last post on this subject, so let me quickly repeat my review criteria:
- Capacity: The product has to have enough space to accommodate a satisfactory quantity of the owner’s miniatures and gaming materials.
- Customizability: The owner should be able to tailor the product’s capacity to his particular needs, i.e., to the peculiar shapes and sizes of his miniatures.
- Reusability: The owner should be able to re-customize the product’s capacity if he decides to reorganize, or if his needs change.
- Accessibility: The owner should be able to get his miniatures into and out of the product with a minimum of fuss.
- Manageability: The fully-loaded product should be convenient for the owner to move from Point A to Point B.
- Security: The product should to be sturdy enough to withstand, and protect its contents from, travel-related damage.
- Economy: The product shouldn’t be inordinately expensive.
- Attractiveness: Form certainly follows function, but the product nevertheless shouldn’t be butt-ugly.
In my last post I’d promised to cover Chessex and GW cases, but given the depth of the review I’ll stick to one at a time. A review of GW cases will be forthcoming.
Chessex
Most wargame and RPG grognards have owned a Chessex product at one time or another. The company’s been around what seems like forever: I can remember seeing Chessex ads in Dragon Magazine when I first started getting into gaming in the early 1980s. Chessex’s bread and butter is dice, but they also sell a line of figure storage boxes. The boxes come in two sizes — “large” (holding two 16″ x 6 ½” foam trays) and ”small” (holding one 9″ x 4″ foam tray) — and different SKUs have different pre-cut foam configurations inside. The cases themselves are made entirely of sturdy plastic, and have hinged lids and a lift-latch closure.
Capacity is where the Chessex boxes really fall down. The most tightly-packed foam configuration available for the large case has 80 1 ½” x 1″ cutouts. Customizability is also fairly limited: while the small box is available without pre-cut foam, one’s customization options are otherwise limited to trying to (very carefully) remove the dividers from between cutouts to fit larger miniatures. Reusability is thus only decent: if your miniatures fit in the cutouts you can reuse Chessex cases all day, but after you cut the foam there’s no going back.
Accessibility, on the other hand, is quite good, owing both to the relatively small size of the cases but also to Chessex’s inclusion of a stiff divider between the trays in the large case. The divider has stitched-on nylon handles that are longer than the top tray is tall, so that the top tray can be lifted out of the case by the divider, to get at the figures in the bottom tray. The only gripe here is that the lift-latch closure on the cases stays stiff even after hundreds of openings, and it can take some effort to actually open the cases. Manageability is, though, mediocre: the texturing on the exterior of the cases doesn’t prevent them from sliding off one another when stacked, and they don’t have any handles or suchlike. Security is awesome: the hard plastic exterior of the cases is practically bombproof, and the interior open-cell foam is stiff enough to provide great protection without compressing the contents. Furthermore, the textured grey cases are reasonably good-looking, so attractiveness is above average. At $30 for the large cases and $13 for the small cases, though, economy is questionable: while a smallish Sabol Designs case is soft-sided and thus nowhere near as sturdy as a Chessex case, it has far greater (and far more configurable) storage at around the same $30 price point.
The verdict:
- Capacity: D. In absolute terms the large case can hold a healthy number of figures, but relative to competitors Chessex cases’ capacity is miniscule.
- Customizability: D. Very limited options, here, and if you have figures that require greater than a cubic inch of storage volume you’re pretty much out of luck.
- Reusability: C. Fine if you’re switching out one set of regularly-sized figures for another set of regularly-sized figures, but nothing doing otherwise.
- Accessibility: A-. The small size of the cases work in their favor, here, and Chessex has added some handy features to the large case to make it even easier to get into and out of them.
- Manageability: B-. Since they lack handles, you can carry one or two of these cases like textbooks, but beyond that you’ll have to throw them into a bag or cardboard box.
- Security: A. The hard-sided cases aren’t likely to be destroyed by anything the typical gamer throws at them, and the protective foam is good quality stuff that ensures the contents are well-protected.
- Economy: C. Notwithstanding the quality of construction, the lack of capacity means the cases are of mediocre value at their price point.
- Attractiveness: B. The textured surface of the cases doesn’t help with manageability, but it makes them look nice.
Overall: C+. For tabletop roleplaying games or skirmish-style wargames, where a gamer needs a storage and transport solution for a limited number of regularly-sized figures, Chessex cases might just be ideal. Other wargames, though, will stretch and exceed Chessex cases’ capacity, and trying to wrangle an army that’s crammed into multiple Chessex cases will likely strain a gamer’s patience and wallet.